Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Millie Cooke results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 859 hits . Analysis detected 5,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of â 85% (1,319 of 8,281 authors). This Millie Cooke is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Millie Cooke
Author details
Total words: 4,032
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.1% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 13.6% 13.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.5% 15.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.8% 11.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.4%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 13.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst