Author summary
37% 1 analyzed article/video 664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan Advance results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , In-Group Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 396 hits . Analysis detected 1,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,255 of 8,291 authors). This Michigan Advance is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group. Michigan Advance
Author details
Total words: 2,656
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.7% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Horn Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.0% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst