Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Jones results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 430 hits . Analysis detected 1,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,624 of 6,262 authors). This Michael Jones is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group. Michael Jones
Author details
Total words: 2,580
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.1% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst