Author summary
6% 2 analyzed articles/videos 286 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Barba results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 89 hits . Analysis detected 556 faulty-reasoning hits from 858 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,240 of 6,382 authors). This Michael Barba is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group. Michael Barba
Author details
Total words: 858
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.6% percentile 4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles858 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.7% 4.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 10.4% 10.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 4.1% 4.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst