Author summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Arria results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 810 hits. Analysis detected 4,464 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (1,618 of 8,531 authors). This Michael Arria is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Michael Arria
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠81%Michael Arria (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,816
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510081.0% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 21.2%21.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 21.2%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos