Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 192 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meg Felling results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Pessimism Bias , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 149 hits . Analysis detected 860 faulty-reasoning hits from 768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 89% (682 of 6,135 authors). This Meg Felling is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group. Meg Felling
Author details
Total words: 768
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.9% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles768 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 19.4% 19.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 11.2% 11.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.4% 4.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 4.4% 4.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Unattributed Quote: Author 19.4%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.8%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst