Author summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Memrick results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Halo Effect , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 305 hits . Analysis detected 2,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,709 of 8,436 authors). This Matthew Memrick is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Matthew Memrick
Author details
Total words: 3,644
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst