Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MATT O'BRIEN AP technology writers results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 1,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,058 of 6,296 authors). This MATT O'BRIEN AP technology writers is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
MATT O'BRIEN AP technology writers
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
68%MATT O'BRIEN AP technology writers (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,500
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510067.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.3%11.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.7%2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.5%4.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 6.2%6.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos