Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mark Sweney results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 505 hits. Analysis detected 2,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,565 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,257 authors). This Mark Sweney is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Mark Sweney
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Mark Sweney (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,565
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 11.1%11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 19.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.1%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos