‘Brazen corruption’: critics denounce Trump Media plan to sell priority access to Truth Social posts 51%

By Mark Sweney0%

7/17/2026, 1:16:58 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 394 hits. Analysis detected 1,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 855 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.7% and a BS Rank of 51% (10,775 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the article peer group.

Donald Trump’s media company is planning to charge for special high-speed access to Truth Social posts, including possibly his own, affecting national security and financial markets. 
The move announced on Thursday would allow Wall Street trading firms and other institutions to get news first from top Truth Social contributors so they could profit off subsequent moves in stocks, bonds and interest rates. 
Called Truth PSI, the new service comes amid a flurry of other deals by Trump and his family company that critics say are exploiting the presidency for profit. 
It follows similar offers of paid access on rival platforms, although with one key difference: the most popular Truth Social poster is the president himself, and, as the biggest shareholder of the publicly traded parent company, he would benefit directly. 
“He’s selling expedited, privileged access to information about what he is doing as president,” said Kathleen Clark of the Washington University School of Law and an expert in government conflict of interest rules. 
“It’s yet more brazen corruption, an improper exploitation of government power to enrich himself.” 
Followers of Trump can already choose to get push notifications alerting them when new posts have been published. 
The Trump family company declined to comment about whether the new feature was profiting off the presidency. 
Truth Social’s public parent, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG), did not respond to emailed questions by Associated Press, including whether Trump’s posts would be excluded from the offering. 
A press release states the new service would allow traders to see “the highest-ranking Truth Social accounts” before other people. 
The US president has the most followers  12.9 million  followed by his eldest son, Donald Jr, and, close behind, his son Eric. 
The release did not say how much customers would be charged. 
Trump regularly uses Truth Social to announce major decisions that affect markets, such as posts about the Iran war and tariffs. 
Last year Trump made more than 100 posts in a single day as global stock markets fell sharply amid fears his economic policies could produce a “Trumpcession” in the US. 
The Iran posts in particular are impactful because investors are worried that higher oil prices will continue to stoke inflation and possibly force the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates. 
Stock in TMTG has plunged more than 70% since the president took office last year, erasing $6bn (£4.4bn) in shareholder wealth. 
Those losses, along with billions more of investor losses tied to new Trump family crypto businesses, have drawn scrutiny after Trump’s annual disclosure of his financial holdings shows he took in more than $1bn in revenue last year in the same companies and offerings. 
Trump launched TMTG in 2021 after Meta’s Facebook and X banned him for apparently encouraging his supporters to participate in the 6 January attack on the US Capitol. 
He went on to launch Truth Social in February 2022 and two years later floated the business  trading under the ticker symbol “DJT”  Trump’s initials  at an initial valuation of $8bn. 
Trump indirectly owns about 53% of TMTG through shares he transferred to a trust in December 2024, a month before he took office, giving him a paper fortune of about $1.41bn based on TMTG’s current $2.67bn market capitalisation. 
The US president earned $2.2bn in total in his first year back in office, according to a mandatory disclosure with the US Office of Government Ethics. 
About $1.4bn of his revenue came from his cryptocurrency business, including $500m from the World Liberty Financial venture he co-founded with his sons and the sons of Steve Witkoff, his special envoy. 
Trump also earned about $500m after an investment firm tied to the United Arab Emirates bought almost half of the company in a controversial deal. 
Conflict of interest laws would bar US government officials from owning a company that profited off their office by selling access to their decisions through public posts, Clark said. 
However, the president and vice-president, she notes, are excluded from the provision. 
Despite that, all presidents since the law was passed decades ago have acted as if it applied  selling individual stocks, dumping business holdings or putting their financial assets in a blind trust so they would not know what was being bought and sold on their behalf while they wielded power  but Trump has refused. 
Trump Media has been trying to lift its stock price recently by branching into various businesses, including cryptocurrency, financial services and even nuclear fusion. 
It recently replaced its longtime chief executive, Devin Nunes, a former congressman, with a seasoned media executive, Kevin McGurn. 
In the release, McGurn described the Truth PSI move as part of a “strategy to monetise proprietary assets”. 
He added that he expected it to become a “meaningful, ongoing source of revenue”. 
Trump Media has said it plans to start the service next month and has already signed up customers. 
The company’s stock rose 0.6% to $9.63 on Thursday. 
Before Trump took office last year, it closed at $40. 
Associated Press contributed to this report 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.4%Mark Sweney: 6.9%the Guardian: 3.7%Confirmation Bias15.4%This article: 1.2%Mark Sweney: 0.8%the Guardian: 0.6%Anchoring Bias1.2%This article: 5.8%Mark Sweney: 3.0%the Guardian: 3.1%Availability Heuristic5.8%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.5%the Guardian: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Mark Sweney: 8.3%the Guardian: 6.1%Framing Effect5.0%This article: 6.9%Mark Sweney: 3.1%the Guardian: 0.6%Loss Aversion6.9%This article: 8.7%Mark Sweney: 2.9%the Guardian: 0.6%Status Quo Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Mark Sweney: 0.5%the Guardian: 2.5%Optimism Bias1.6%This article: 7.0%Mark Sweney: 2.3%the Guardian: 2.1%Pessimism Bias7.0%This article: 46.1%Mark Sweney: 19.7%the Guardian: 10.4%Negativity Bias46.1%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Mark Sweney: 1.1%the Guardian: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error3.3%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Mark Sweney: 0.7%the Guardian: 3.2%Halo Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.1%Mark Sweney: 0.4%the Guardian: 1.2%Recency Bias1.1%This article: 4.0%Mark Sweney: 1.3%the Guardian: 0.4%Primacy Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 2.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.3%Mark Sweney: 4.7%the Guardian: 3.8%Appeal to Authority10.3%This article: 11.2%Mark Sweney: 3.7%the Guardian: 1.7%False Dilemma11.2%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.3%Mark Sweney: 5.1%the Guardian: 6.3%Hasty Generalization12.3%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 2.2%the Guardian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 1.6%the Guardian: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.5%the Guardian: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 19.6%Mark Sweney: 11.1%the Guardian: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.6%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.4%Mark Sweney: 1.8%the Guardian: 0.4%Burden of Proof5.4%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.8%Mark Sweney: 0.9%the Guardian: 0.4%Composition/Division2.8%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 22.0%Mark Sweney: 7.3%the Guardian: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)22.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.1%Mark Sweney: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.1%Middle Ground1.1%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.2%Mark Sweney: 2.7%the Guardian: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection6.2%This article: 1.8%Mark Sweney: 2.2%the Guardian: 10.4%Biased Writer Voice1.8%This article: 1.6%Mark Sweney: 0.5%the Guardian: 1.8%Indoctrination1.6%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mark Sweney: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Mark Sweney: 1.6%the Guardian: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.9%

855 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers23%attributed speech661writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageKathleen Clark • 33 words • 100.0% coverageKathleen Clark • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKathleen Clark • 29 words • 0.0% coverageKathleen Clark • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKathleen Clark • 56 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageKevin McGurn • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKevin McGurn • 14 words • 100.0% coverageTrump Media • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kathleen Clark

92%flagged-word coverage
144 attributed words74% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Quote-first Misdirection+19.9 ptsWriter: 3.0%Kathleen Clark: 22.9%22.9%Indoctrination+9.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Kathleen Clark: 9.7%9.7%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Kathleen Clark: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Kathleen Clark: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.