Author summary
25% 1 analyzed article/video 1,029 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Braboy results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Self-Serving Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 218 hits . Analysis detected 1,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 28% (6,521 of 8,982 authors). This Mark Braboy is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Mark Braboy
Author details
Total words: 4,116
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% No True Scotsman: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst