Author summary
61% 1 analyzed article/video 931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marisa Ingemi results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 529 hits . Analysis detected 2,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,793 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,000 of 6,628 authors). This Marisa Ingemi is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Marisa Ingemi
Author details
Total words: 2,793
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.8% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.9% 18.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.4% 11.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.6% Composition/Division: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst