Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manuel Esperon-Rodriguez results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 587 hits . Analysis detected 3,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,799 of 6,628 authors). This Manuel Esperon-Rodriguez is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group. Manuel Esperon-Rodriguez
Author details
Total words: 4,168
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.1% 14.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst