Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,439 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mansur Mirovalev results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 806 hits . Analysis detected 5,612 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,596 of 6,628 authors). This Mansur Mirovalev is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Mansur Mirovalev
Author details
Total words: 5,756
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.0% 14.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.9% 11.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.1% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst