Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madeline Ricchiuto results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 472 hits . Analysis detected 2,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,044 of 6,364 authors). This Madeline Ricchiuto is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group. Madeline Ricchiuto
Author details
Total words: 1,624
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.6% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.7% 26.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 16.4% 16.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 29.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 16.4%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Composition/Division: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst