Gizmodo57%

Pebble’s Round 2 Will Cash In on Smartwatch Nostalgia This Month 71%

By Madeline Ricchiuto0%

7/6/2026, 11:00:12 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 178 hits. Analysis detected 1,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 406 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (6,511 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the article peer group.

Some smartwatches try too hard to be an all-in-one wrist-mounted computer—a minimalist Omni-tool or a Pip-Boy without any sense of whimsy. 
But here are some smartwatches that simply build on the original premise of the wristwatch and keep track of time, and maybe also your steps and messages. 
While short-lived, the original Pebble was one of those smartwatches that didn’t try to be an invasive healthcare-monitoring tool disguised as a watch. 
And it’s finally returning to us next this month. 
Pebble’s Round 2 smartwatch may not look like much at first glance. 
It’s shaped like a traditional wristwatch. 
There are physical buttons on the side—with one styled to look like a traditional winder—a slim bezel, and a traditional 14mm or 20mm band. 
The Round 2 also mimics a classic watch with a 1.3-inch, 260 x 260 display, which puts its size and weight closer to those of typical wristwatches than to the 41mm to 45mm smartwatches from Google, Samsung, and Apple. 
Granted, the larger 41mm to 45mm watches tend to have higher resolutions, ranging from the Apple Watch Series 9 41mm’s 352 x 430 pixels to 480 x 480 pixels on the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra. 
Feature-wise, this is a minimalist smartwatch. 
It has no speakers and no heart rate monitor. 
It’s a light, thin stainless steel device that tells the time, displays incoming text messages, tracks your steps and sleep, and includes a microphone for voice-to-text. 
The Pebble Round 2 does take touchscreen inputs, but for those who don’t enjoy tiny touchscreens, it’s fully controllable via buttons as well. 
So it has some modern features, but the Round 2 sticks to the bare essentials. 
It’s not a smartwatch for the would-be cyborg but a modern update to the classic wristwatch that provides functionality without intrusion. 
In fact, we enjoyed the Pebble Round 2 so much that it was crowned our Best Smartwatch of CES 2026. 
Initially, the Pebble Round 2 was expected to ship in May, but production issues delayed the shipment. 
The Round 2 is now set to begin shipping to customers this month, with all pre-order shipments completed by September, when it hits shelves for the masses. 
In any case, you’ve still got time to pre-order the Pebble Round 2 for just $200 if you happen to be in the market for a smartwatch that doesn’t think it’s smarter than you are. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.6%Madeline Ricchiuto: 3.4%Gizmodo: 4.1%Confirmation Bias8.6%This article: 9.6%Madeline Ricchiuto: 3.1%Gizmodo: 1.4%Anchoring Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.7%Madeline Ricchiuto: 1.7%Gizmodo: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic6.7%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 26.8%Madeline Ricchiuto: 29.1%Gizmodo: 5.5%Framing Effect26.8%This article: 8.6%Madeline Ricchiuto: 2.2%Gizmodo: 0.5%Loss Aversion8.6%This article: 8.6%Madeline Ricchiuto: 2.2%Gizmodo: 0.4%Status Quo Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.3%Madeline Ricchiuto: 6.0%Gizmodo: 3.9%Optimism Bias15.3%This article: 3.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.7%Gizmodo: 2.1%Pessimism Bias3.0%This article: 16.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 4.0%Gizmodo: 7.5%Negativity Bias16.0%This article: 4.9%Madeline Ricchiuto: 2.5%Gizmodo: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Madeline Ricchiuto: 1.4%Gizmodo: 0.9%In-Group Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 1.3%Gizmodo: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 17.2%Madeline Ricchiuto: 7.4%Gizmodo: 2.9%Halo Effect17.2%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 1.4%Gizmodo: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.7%Madeline Ricchiuto: 1.7%Gizmodo: 1.6%Recency Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 5.3%Gizmodo: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.9%Madeline Ricchiuto: 3.7%Gizmodo: 4.3%Appeal to Authority4.9%This article: 11.8%Madeline Ricchiuto: 4.6%Gizmodo: 1.4%False Dilemma11.8%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.2%Madeline Ricchiuto: 1.3%Gizmodo: 5.3%Hasty Generalization5.2%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 15.3%Madeline Ricchiuto: 3.8%Gizmodo: 0.9%Bandwagon15.3%This article: 8.6%Madeline Ricchiuto: 9.2%Gizmodo: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion8.6%This article: 5.2%Madeline Ricchiuto: 1.3%Gizmodo: 1.0%Begging the Question5.2%This article: 4.2%Madeline Ricchiuto: 1.0%Gizmodo: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.2%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 9.6%Madeline Ricchiuto: 2.4%Gizmodo: 0.3%Composition/Division9.6%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 5.7%Madeline Ricchiuto: 1.4%Gizmodo: 0.1%No True Scotsman5.7%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.7%Madeline Ricchiuto: 1.4%Gizmodo: 0.1%Special Pleading5.7%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.9%Madeline Ricchiuto: 1.2%Gizmodo: 4.6%Unattributed Quote4.9%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 43.8%Madeline Ricchiuto: 26.7%Gizmodo: 13.5%Biased Writer Voice43.8%This article: 13.1%Madeline Ricchiuto: 7.6%Gizmodo: 1.6%Indoctrination13.1%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madeline Ricchiuto: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 24.4%Madeline Ricchiuto: 16.4%Gizmodo: 3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…24.4%

406 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.