Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pebble results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 472 hits. Analysis detected 2,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,624 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,962 of 37,536 keywords). This Pebble is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Pebble
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
82%Pebble (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,624
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 26.7%26.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 16.4%16.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 29.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos