Author summary
â 18% 1 analyzed article/video 743 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luis Santana results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 166 hits . Analysis detected 1,306 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of â 29% (6,456 of 9,019 authors). This Luis Santana is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Luis Santana
Author details
Total words: 2,972
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst