Author summary
93%1 analyzed article/video611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luis E. Romero results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 566 hits. Analysis detected 3,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,833 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 91% (633 of 6,382 authors). This Luis E. Romero is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Luis E. Romero
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
91%Luis E. Romero (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,833
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510090.1% percentile
7.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 30.9%30.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 17.1%17.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 22.6%22.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 17.6%17.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 25.3%25.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 6.7%6.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 25.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 22.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 17.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Author 17.1%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos