Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Lucia Cheng results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 55 faulty-reasoning hits from 742 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 8,905 authors). This Lucia Cheng is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Lucia Cheng
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Lucia Cheng (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 742
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles742 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.8%3.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos