Author summary
26% 2 analyzed articles/videos 763 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lorraine Gabbert results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 185 hits . Analysis detected 1,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,624 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,693 of 9,058 authors). This Lorraine Gabbert is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group. Lorraine Gabbert
Author details
Total words: 4,624
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst