Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Lily Mae Lazarus results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 173 hits . Analysis detected 1,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,515 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,350 authors). This Lily Mae Lazarus is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Lily Mae Lazarus
Author details
Total words: 1,515
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.4% 11.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% No True Scotsman: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% Middle Ground: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst