Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,072 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liam Hamama results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,832 hits . Analysis detected 10,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,975 of 6,628 authors). This Liam Hamama is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Liam Hamama
Author details
Total words: 12,288
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 14.9%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.6%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst