Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video3,072 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ilan Goldenberg results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,832 hits. Analysis detected 10,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,974 of 6,628 authors). This Ilan Goldenberg is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Ilan Goldenberg
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
40%Ilan Goldenberg (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,288
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 14.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos