Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Harper results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.2% saturation with 3,386 hits . Analysis detected 20,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,357 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,077 of 6,171 authors). This Lauren Harper is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. Lauren Harper
Author details
Total words: 9,357
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.6% percentile 5.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 36.2% 36.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 31.7% 31.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 14.0% 14.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.6% 15.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 12.9% 12.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 22.6% 22.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 31.7%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 15.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 22.6%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 12.9%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.5%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst