Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 94 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Antonoff Hart results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Bandwagon , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 130 hits . Analysis detected 749 faulty-reasoning hits from 282 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.6% and a BS Rank of 99% (123 of 6,628 authors). This Lauren Antonoff Hart is worse (more manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group. Lauren Antonoff Hart
Author details
Total words: 282
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.2% percentile 16.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles282 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 46.1% 46.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 29.4% 29.4% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 24.8% 24.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 27.3% 27.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 17.0% 17.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 15.3% 15.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.5% 14.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.6% 20.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Author 46.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 29.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 27.3%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Author 20.6%, sitewide 26.9% Bandwagon: Author 24.8%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.1%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 7.5% Primacy Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 0.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst