Author summary
89%2 analyzed articles/videos535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Anzalone results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 350 hits. Analysis detected 2,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,140 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,666 of 8,507 authors). This Kyle Anzalone is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
Kyle Anzalone
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
81%Kyle Anzalone (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,140
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

80% percentile
025507510080.4% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.0%5.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 10.5%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos