Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kuwait results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 450 hits . Analysis detected 2,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Kuwait is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Kuwait
Author details
Total words: 3,108
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.5% 14.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst