Author summary
⁠13%5 analyzed articles/videos2,307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kolby Fedore results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 585 hits. Analysis detected 3,522 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,446 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (8,574 of 8,916 authors). This Kolby Fedore is better (less manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
Kolby Fedore
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠4%Kolby Fedore (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,446
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

4% percentile
02550751003.8% percentile
0.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos