Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video949 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Maimann results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anchoring Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 542 hits. Analysis detected 4,067 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,729 of 6,392 authors). This Kevin Maimann is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Kevin Maimann
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
73%Kevin Maimann (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,796
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

73% percentile
025507510073.0% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 7.9%7.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos