Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Rogers results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 583 hits. Analysis detected 3,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,343 of 6,630 authors). This Katie Rogers is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Katie Rogers
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
50%Katie Rogers (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,196
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510049.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.2%11.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos