Author summary
ā 4% 1 analyzed article/video 1,960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Fairbanks results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 210 hits . Analysis detected 1,434 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of ā 2% (8,146 of 8,270 authors). This Katie Fairbanks is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. Katie Fairbanks
Author details
Total words: 7,840
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 0.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst