Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kathryn Palmer results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 1,074 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,077 authors). This Kathryn Palmer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Kathryn Palmer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Kathryn Palmer (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,752
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 9.9%9.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos