Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 919 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Lindsay results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Pessimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 489 hits . Analysis detected 3,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of â 64% (3,416 of 9,435 authors). This Kate Lindsay is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Kate Lindsay
Author details
Total words: 3,676
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.3% 13.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.3% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst