Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karin Larsen results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 608 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,859 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (4,503 of 6,628 authors). This Karin Larsen is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Karin Larsen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠33%Karin Larsen (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,859
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

32% percentile
025507510032.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 9.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos