Author summary
41%1 analyzed article/video1,209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kaitlan Collins results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 2,962 hits. Analysis detected 19,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,263 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,409 of 6,321 authors). This Kaitlan Collins is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Kaitlan Collins
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
62%Kaitlan Collins (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 24,263
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

62% percentile
025507510061.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles24.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 12.2%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 11.5%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos