BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Red Herring, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 49% saturation with 592 hits. Analysis detected 2,784 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,209 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.8% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,853 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the article peer group.

The White House is upgrading its front door to fortify the entrance 
If you've walked around the White House recently, you may have noticed that scaffolding has covered the north portico. 
Well, Cruz just put up this tarp here covering that scaffolding. 
*** White House official tells me the North portico columns are undergoing standard restoration work, specifically stone repair in those columns. 
So it's not *** new structure going up, but maintenance on one of the most recognizable parts of the building. 
It's happening at *** time when there are *** lot of visible changes around the White House. 
There's the planned ballroom over on the East Wing, and then President Trump recently said, They're going to be adding *** new helipad on the south lawn. 
Updated: 4:15 PM EDT Jul 12, 2026 
Editorial Standards  
The White House is making security-focused upgrades to its front door, an official told CNN, in a project that’s expected to take months.The changes, which sources said have long been advocated by the US Secret Service, are aimed at fortifying the White House entrance at the North Portico, which has recently been obscured by scaffolding and a tarp as workers repair the exterior columns at President Donald Trump’s request.But unlike many of Trump’s projects around the White House  from hanging gold signage to paving the Rose Garden  the work on the front door is not cosmetic, and instead focused on enhancing its security, the White House official said.The U.S. 
Secret Service did not immediately respond to CNN’s request for comment.There are other potential security upgrades in the works, as well. 
On Friday, the Trump administration submitted plans for new fencing that would enclose Lafayette Park, the area surrounding the north side of the White House.It’s not unusual for the park to be intermittently closed to the public during presidential movements, and the project’s goal is to offer a more permanent solution to the existing patchwork of temporary barricades, what officials describe as “comprehensive yet flexible fencing strategy for varying security risk.” 
The permanent fencing is meant to make it easier to shut down the road when needed.US Secret Service, the Executive Office of the President, and the Department of Interior submitted a lengthy proposal to the US Commission of Fine Arts on the fencing, offering an initial plan that will now need to be formally approved by multiple federal agencies. 
“Phased implementation” of the project could begin as soon as 2027, per the proposal.The security enhancements come as Trump has been the target of multiple assassination attempts, including at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner at the Washington Hilton in April. 
And last month, there was an alleged plot to attack the UFC fight on the White House South Lawn. 
Officials have pointed to those incidents as justification for the president’s sprawling, 90,000-square-foot ballroom project, which they’ve said is expected to include a sophisticated drone port and sniper nests, along with a secure underground bunker.The North Portico fortifications are expected to be complete by approximately mid-September, the White House official said.On Friday morning, a third panel of tarp featuring an image of the White House exterior was unfurled around the North Portico scaffolding, where the work on the columns is ongoing.Video below: See video of the tarp being installedInterior Secretary Doug Burgum had predicted that the column project, which involves stone restoration work, would be done “quickly,” and it was unclear why the tarp had been installed.“ 
It’ll go very quickly. 
I think they’ve been up, maybe, just about 10 days now, but these guys work very quick,” Burgum said in a recent appearance on “The Katie Miller Podcast.” 
The White House is making security-focused upgrades to its front door, an official told CNN, in a project that’s expected to take months. 
The changes, which sources said have long been advocated by the US Secret Service, are aimed at fortifying the White House entrance at the North Portico, which has recently been obscured by scaffolding and a tarp as workers repair the exterior columns at President Donald Trump’s request. 
But unlike many of Trump’s projects around the White House  from hanging gold signage to paving the Rose Garden  the work on the front door is not cosmetic, and instead focused on enhancing its security, the White House official said. 
The U.S. 
Secret Service did not immediately respond to CNN’s request for comment. 
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images via CNN Newsource 
The door of the North Portico of the White House is visible as workers perform maintenance on the portico's columns on June 22. 
There are other potential security upgrades in the works, as well. 
On Friday, the Trump administration submitted plans for new fencing that would enclose Lafayette Park, the area surrounding the north side of the White House. 
Column restoration underway at White House, with scaffolding and new tarp covering area 
It’s not unusual for the park to be intermittently closed to the public during presidential movements, and the project’s goal is to offer a more permanent solution to the existing patchwork of temporary barricades, what officials describe as “comprehensive yet flexible fencing strategy for varying security risk.” 
The permanent fencing is meant to make it easier to shut down the road when needed. 
US Secret Service, the Executive Office of the President, and the Department of Interior submitted a lengthy proposal to the US Commission of Fine Arts on the fencing, offering an initial plan that will now need to be formally approved by multiple federal agencies. 
“Phased implementation” of the project could begin as soon as 2027, per the proposal. 
The security enhancements come as Trump has been the target of multiple assassination attempts, including at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner at the Washington Hilton in April. 
And last month, there was an alleged plot to attack the UFC fight on the White House South Lawn. 
Officials have pointed to those incidents as justification for the president’s sprawling, 90,000-square-foot ballroom project, which they’ve said is expected to include a sophisticated drone port and sniper nests, along with a secure underground bunker. 
8 men indicted in planned drone and sniper attack on White House UFC cage-fighting show 
The North Portico fortifications are expected to be complete by approximately mid-September, the White House official said. 
On Friday morning, a third panel of tarp featuring an image of the White House exterior was unfurled around the North Portico scaffolding, where the work on the columns is ongoing. 
Video below: See video of the tarp being installed 
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum had predicted that the column project, which involves stone restoration work, would be done “quickly,” and it was unclear why the tarp had been installed. 
“It’ll go very quickly. 
I think they’ve been up, maybe, just about 10 days now, but these guys work very quick,” Burgum said in a recent appearance on “The Katie Miller Podcast.” 
No weather data available 
Make WPBF a preferred source on Google 
The GOAT: Hooved friend provides moral support to firefighters in Colorado 
Martha Lillard, last US polio patient using iron lung, dies at 78 in Oklahoma 
Who will replace Lindsey Graham? 
How vacancies are filled in U.S. 
Senate 
Benny, the Disneyland security dog, retires 
Loading more articles... 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.6%Betsy Klein: 1.5%WJCL: 5.4%Confirmation Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 20.8%Betsy Klein: 5.3%WJCL: 4.7%Availability Heuristic20.8%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 2.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Betsy Klein: 1.7%WJCL: 0.0%Overconfidence Bias4.6%This article: 17.8%Betsy Klein: 9.5%WJCL: 8.4%Framing Effect17.8%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 9.8%Betsy Klein: 2.1%WJCL: 0.0%Status Quo Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Betsy Klein: 2.8%WJCL: 0.0%Optimism Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.3%WJCL: 0.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.0%Betsy Klein: 5.2%WJCL: 13.8%Negativity Bias19.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 2.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 2.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Betsy Klein: 0.4%WJCL: 1.6%Halo Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.1%Betsy Klein: 2.5%WJCL: 0.0%Recency Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 49.0%Betsy Klein: 12.2%WJCL: 4.4%Appeal to Authority49.0%This article: 3.9%Betsy Klein: 1.4%WJCL: 0.0%False Dilemma3.9%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.1%Betsy Klein: 1.3%WJCL: 0.0%Hasty Generalization3.1%This article: 25.2%Betsy Klein: 1.4%WJCL: 1.1%Red Herring25.2%This article: 0.6%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Bandwagon0.6%This article: 3.1%Betsy Klein: 4.4%WJCL: 9.4%Appeal to Emotion3.1%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.8%Betsy Klein: 4.8%WJCL: 9.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.8%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 12.3%Betsy Klein: 0.8%WJCL: 1.2%Burden of Proof12.3%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.9%Betsy Klein: 0.8%WJCL: 0.0%Anecdotal0.9%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.1%WJCL: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.1%Betsy Klein: 2.0%WJCL: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.1%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.7%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.9%Betsy Klein: 11.5%WJCL: 2.4%Unattributed Quote9.9%This article: 1.7%Betsy Klein: 0.4%WJCL: 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 12.7%Betsy Klein: 7.1%WJCL: 6.6%Biased Writer Voice12.7%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 1.5%WJCL: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Betsy Klein: 0.0%WJCL: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.6%Betsy Klein: 0.6%WJCL: 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.6%

1209 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers20%attributed speech967writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 111 words • 100.0% coverageUS Secret Service • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 71 words • 0.0% coverageUS Commission of Fine Arts • 59 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 117 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Burgum • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Burgum • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageUS Secret Service • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageUS Commission of Fine Arts • 44 words • 0.0% coverageUS Commission of Fine Arts • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Burgum • 29 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Burgum • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Burgum • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

US Secret Service

66%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words13% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Unattributed Quote+55.4 ptsWriter: 10.2%US Secret Service: 65.6%65.6%Biased Writer Voice-15.8 ptsWriter: 15.8%US Secret Service: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%US Secret Service: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -0.7 ptsWriter: 0.7%US Secret Service: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.