Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Justin Papp results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 312 hits . Analysis detected 2,984 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,341 authors). This Justin Papp is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Justin Papp
Author details
Total words: 2,712
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.8%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst