Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Dzurillay results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 399 hits. Analysis detected 3,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,392 of 6,628 authors). This Julia Dzurillay is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Julia Dzurillay
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
79%Julia Dzurillay (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,700
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.2%13.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 14.8%14.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.8%6.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 14.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.5%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos