The five US states where Americans are flocking to… and where they're leaving in droves 77%

By Julia Dzurillay0%

3/28/2026, 12:25:49 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.4% saturation with 219 hits. Analysis detected 1,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 675 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (5,210 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the article peer group.

Nearly 15 million Americans packed up and moved in 2025 - but a clear pattern has emerged over where they want to live now. 
New data from HireAHelper shows residents are increasingly ditching expensive coastal states and heading instead to cheaper, warmer parts of the South and Mountain West. 
The moving firm’s 2026 Migration Report found South Carolina led the nation for net migration per capita last year, gaining 79.7 residents for every 10,000 already living there. 
Major cities like Charleston and Myrtle Beach draw a number of young residents and curious tourists, with those more populated areas boasting a growing restaurant and bar scene. 
South Carolina’s rise will not come as a huge shock. 
Charleston and the Myrtle Beach area have become magnets for movers looking for coastal living without the price tag of the Northeast or California. 
Idaho was next at 63.2, followed by Delaware at 54.5, Tennessee at 43.6 and Alabama at 36.6. 
The shift points to what many Americans now want most: lower living costs, lower taxes, more space and a better quality of life. 
HireAHelper said lower-cost states were far more likely to post gains, especially across the Southeast and Mountain West. 
Idaho also continued to pull in newcomers, with HireAHelper saying the state’s mix of affordability, outdoor lifestyle and lighter congestion than neighboring Western states kept demand strong. 
Charleston, South Carolina has a lively downtown area where history buffs can see where the civil war began 
It was second, with 63.2 newcomers out of every 10,000 locals. 
According to the Idaho Statesman, wealthy, educated Californians represent a huge chunk of Americans moving to Idaho, with one of the biggest draws being the high housing costs along the coast. 
Delaware ranked third, helped by its location near major East Coast job markets and a relatively low-tax setup that includes no sales tax. 
Being just a stone's throw away from Washington DC, Philadelphia and New York City is a huge perk for young professionals who want the hustle and bustle of the city without breaking the bank. 
With its warm weather and no state income tax on wages, Tennessee - in fourth place - is another hotspot for new residents. 
In 2025, the state had 43.6 newcomers for every 10,000 people already living there. 
HireAHelper said its appeal now goes beyond just its lack of state income tax, with Nashville in particular benefiting from job growth, cultural pull and rising investor interest. 
Elvis fans flock to Graceland in Memphis, TN, to see a bit of music history, while Dollywood in Pigeon Forge was named one of the best theme parks in the US. 
And Alabama rounded out the top five, with Huntsville emerging as one of its biggest draws. 
'You can buy a house for the same price as the one you had on the West Coast, but it will be at least double the size and you will get a giant plot of land to go with it,' U-Haul Vice President for most of Alabama, Doug Weston, said, according to Alabama.com. 
Massachusetts saw the most residents leaving, with Boston being a major draw of college students 
Not every state saw an influx of new natives. 
The states with the most American moving out are Kansas, California, Maryland and New York. 
Cost-of-living plays a massive role in migration, as New York and California hold two of the most expensive cities in the US (San Fransisco and New York City). 
The state with the most residents leaving is Massachusetts with 37.9 out of every 10,000 people ditching the area last year. 
This could be due to Massachusetts' high taxes compared to states like Florida or South Carolina. 
The trends suggest that as prices increase, Americans are favor smaller, more affordable cities rather than bigger, overcrowded and expensive ones. 
Separate PODS data also found the Myrtle Beach, South Carolina and Wilmington, North Carolina area ranked as the top move-in city market for the third straight year in 2025. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.6%Julia Dzurillay: 6.0%Daily Mail: 3.7%Confirmation Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%Julia Dzurillay: 4.1%Daily Mail: 3.5%Availability Heuristic12.4%This article: 8.7%Julia Dzurillay: 6.1%Daily Mail: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic8.7%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.9%Daily Mail: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Julia Dzurillay: 13.1%Daily Mail: 9.1%Framing Effect8.3%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.0%Julia Dzurillay: 5.5%Daily Mail: 2.3%Optimism Bias5.0%This article: 1.5%Julia Dzurillay: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.2%Pessimism Bias1.5%This article: 2.2%Julia Dzurillay: 1.9%Daily Mail: 12.8%Negativity Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Julia Dzurillay: 3.3%Daily Mail: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error9.8%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Julia Dzurillay: 1.1%Daily Mail: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.6%This article: 14.7%Julia Dzurillay: 9.1%Daily Mail: 4.6%Halo Effect14.7%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.3%Julia Dzurillay: 2.8%Daily Mail: 1.6%Recency Bias11.3%This article: 2.4%Julia Dzurillay: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.5%Primacy Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 27.3%Julia Dzurillay: 6.8%Daily Mail: 4.0%Appeal to Authority27.3%This article: 3.1%Julia Dzurillay: 0.8%Daily Mail: 1.1%False Dilemma3.1%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.8%Julia Dzurillay: 14.8%Daily Mail: 4.3%Hasty Generalization6.8%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.2%Julia Dzurillay: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon2.2%This article: 8.6%Julia Dzurillay: 3.3%Daily Mail: 7.6%Appeal to Emotion8.6%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 30.7%Julia Dzurillay: 11.5%Daily Mail: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)30.7%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.1%Julia Dzurillay: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division4.1%This article: 15.1%Julia Dzurillay: 5.7%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal15.1%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.1%Julia Dzurillay: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.1%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.0%Julia Dzurillay: 3.0%Daily Mail: 3.8%Unattributed Quote12.0%This article: 7.9%Julia Dzurillay: 2.0%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection7.9%This article: 32.4%Julia Dzurillay: 11.6%Daily Mail: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice32.4%This article: 3.4%Julia Dzurillay: 0.9%Daily Mail: 0.8%Indoctrination3.4%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Dzurillay: 0.0%Daily Mail: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

675 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers23%attributed speech518writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageHireAHelper • 18 words • 0.0% coverageHireAHelper • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageIdaho Statesman • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageHireAHelper • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDoug Weston • 53 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Doug Weston

100%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words34% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Doug Weston: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+94.6 ptsWriter: 5.4%Doug Weston: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-42.3 ptsWriter: 42.3%Doug Weston: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.4 ptsWriter: 4.4%Doug Weston: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.