Author summary
47% 2 analyzed articles/videos 961 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Barnett results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 259 hits . Analysis detected 2,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,082 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 26% (6,745 of 9,092 authors). This Julia Barnett is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group. Julia Barnett
Author details
Total words: 5,082
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst