Author summary
48%1 analyzed article/video319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Rogers results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Loss Aversion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 305 hits. Analysis detected 1,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,630 of 9,095 authors). This Josh Rogers is worse (more manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Josh Rogers
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
83%Josh Rogers (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,276
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510082.1% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 23.9%23.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 6.8%6.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.2%4.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 23.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Burden of Proof: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos