Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Ruelas results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 620 hits. Analysis detected 5,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (3,397 of 6,263 authors). This Joseph Ruelas is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Joseph Ruelas
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠46%Joseph Ruelas (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,572
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

46% percentile
025507510045.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos