Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,951 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Yerushalmy (earlier) results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 942 hits . Analysis detected 7,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (2,979 of 6,221 authors). This Jonathan Yerushalmy (earlier) is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Jonathan Yerushalmy (earlier)
Author details
Total words: 7,804
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst