Author summary
41% 1 analyzed article/video 394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Vanian results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 236 hits . Analysis detected 655 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,182 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 88% (790 of 6,493 authors). This Jonathan Vanian is worse (more manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group. Jonathan Vanian
Author details
Total words: 1,182
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.8% percentile 6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.0% 20.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.3% 8.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.3%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst