Author summary
81%1 analyzed article/video901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Phillips results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 465 hits. Analysis detected 2,605 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,703 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,638 of 6,235 authors). This Jonathan Phillips is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Jonathan Phillips
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
58%Jonathan Phillips (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,703
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 17.2%17.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.4%2.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.1%4.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Author 17.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos