Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Markman results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 515 hits . Analysis detected 3,773 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,611 of 6,628 authors). This Jon Markman is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. Jon Markman
Author details
Total words: 4,836
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.5% 8.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst