Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Schroyer results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 746 hits . Analysis detected 5,092 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,129 of 6,227 authors). This John Schroyer is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. John Schroyer
Author details
Total words: 8,084
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst