Author summary
77%4 analyzed articles/videos2,539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Light results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 1,562 hits. Analysis detected 9,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,449 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (3,153 of 9,351 authors). This John Light is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
John Light
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
67%John Light (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,449
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510066.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.5%16.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 13.1%13.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.2%15.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate