Author summary
0%9 analyzed articles/videos5,666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joel Rose results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 2,871 hits. Analysis detected 23,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,285 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,445 of 6,135 authors). This Joel Rose is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Joel Rose
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
61%Joel Rose (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 16,285
Article count: 9
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles16.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 8.6%8.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 14.8%14.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.8%4.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 14.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate